Medmerry, West Sussex coastal flooding


Regions:
North Sea
Scale:
Ecosystems:
Coastal, Open ocean
Goals:
Restoring ecosystems and their functions, Developing climate change adaptation, Improving risk management and resilience
Nbs actions:
Establishing nature-based solutions for coastal resilience
Topics (Keywords):
Biodiversity, Climate change, Coastal Resillience, Green space management, Land management, Heritage (cultural and natural), Nature-based solutions, Resilience
Start/End date
31 December 2000 to 31 December 2012
Client

City of Medmerry

Design Team

the UK Environment Agency

Awards
Area Characterisation

The study area is Medmerry coastline located in south east England. Coastal flooding has long been a problem at Medmerry and a serious risk to the nearby towns of Selsey and Pagham. The previously existing defence, a 3km shingle bank, was subject to regular breach. As well as offering a deficient level of protection, the shingle bank’s maintenance had become costly and unsustainable. An issue in the wider region of The Solent has been the loss of environmentally important coastal habitat, as a result of coastal squeeze. The impacts of development and flood defence infrastructure around the large, urbanised areas of Southampton and Portsmouth have caused local sea levels to rise and wetland and intertidal habitats to be lost to the sea.

Objectives

  • Sustainable flood risk management: It will provide a higher standard of protection to the area
  • Creation of compensatory intertidal habitat: Delivering 183ha of intertidal habitat, including mudflat, saltmarsh and transitional grassland.
  • Involvement of local communities: Creating new access routes and viewpoints

Actions

At first the strategy by UK Environment Agency (EA) to build new inland defences from the existing coastline was not received well from the local community. In response the EA worked with a large group of concerned local people to form the Medmerry Stakeholder

Advisory Group (MStAG), a group of self-elected representatives from among the wider group to represent local views, interact with the project team and report back to the community. In 2008, land was purchased for the realignment.

Construction began in October 2011 and was completed in late. To assist in decision making on biodiversity issues a Habitat Creation Working Group was created. A further partnership with the RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) helped manage construction during breeding times, particularly for rare birds. Important Bronze Age settlements were also discovered in the site and were managed in collaboration with the Centre for Applied Archaeology at the University College London.

Potential impacts/benefitis

Enhancing sustainable urbanisation

Restoring ecosystems and their functions

Developing climate change adaptation; improving risk management and resilience

Sustainable development of coastal regions.

Increase awareness of NBS solution & their effectiveness and co benefits.

Increase Biodiversity.

Increase quality and quantity of green and blue infrastructures.

Improve connectivity and functionality of green and blue infrastructures.

Increase achievements of biodiversity targets.

Increased cultural richness

Reduce flood risk.

Better protection and restoration of coastal ecosystems.

NBS benefits
  • Developing climate change adaptation; improving risk management and resilience
  • Better protection and restoration of coastal ecosystems
  • Reduce drought risk
  • Restoring ecosystems and their functions
  • Improve connectivity and functionality of green and blue infrastructures
  • Increase achievements of biodiversity targets
  • Increase Biodiversity
  • Increase quality and quantity of green and blue infrastructures
  • Increased cultural richness and biodiversity
  • Enhancing sustainable urbanisation
  • Increase awareness of NBS solution & their effectiveness and co benefits
  • Sustainable development of coastal regions
Transferability of the Results

Coastal squeeze remains an issue for other managed realignment schemes, which can be subject to the same erosion processes as natural coastal wetlands. The same methodology of creating water banks can be applied to areas that are in danger by floods. Managed realignment to address intertidal habitat loss or biodiversity still remains debated so it must be studied individually and extensively for every case.

Lessons learned

  • Collaboration. The success of this project depended on close collaboration between a wide range of stakeholders which allowed for innovative problem-solving
  • Engaging with local residents early and often to answer questions and address concerns is critical to carrying out a successful project and creates an environment of trust
  • Forming specialist groups to manage complex issues such as habitat management, and archaeological findings that may impact construction timelines are very important for the stakeholder concerns

Contacts

Nick GRAY, UK Environment Agency, Worthing, England (nick.gray@environment-agency.gov.uk)

Information on this page is hosted by Oppla