Vingis and Verkiu parks in Vilnius, Lithuania (URBANGAIA project)


Regions:
Temperate, Continental
Scale:
Ecosystems:
Urban
Goals:
Enhancing sustainable urbanization
Nbs actions:
Nature-based solutions for improving well-being in urban areas
Topics (Keywords):
Biodiversity, Climate Resillience, Ecosystem services, Governance, Green infrastructure, Green space management, Indicators/criteria, Nature-based solutions, Resilience, stakeholder consultations, Stakeholders, Urban Regeneration, Urbanisation, Valuation
Start/End date
30 September 2016 to 29 September 2019
Client
Design Team
Awards
Area Characterisation

Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania (humid continental climate, Koppen Dfb) has approximately 500.000 inhabitants and is listed in the UNESCO world heritage (Old town). Despite the increasing urban sprawl, especially in the post-socialist period, large parts of the city are covered by green areas, such as urban parks, private gardens (e,g. Zverynas) and protected areas (e.g. Verkiu park), which provide a wide range of services to city inhabitants. The existence and use of green areas, makes Vilnius a living laboratory for testing the importance of green infrastructure and ecosystem services in urban areas.

Objectives

The aim of the project is to develop realistic indicators to evaluate, manage and develop performant Green and Blue infrastructure (GBIs) in cities and intensively managed landscapes. UrbanGaia explicitly focusses on analysis of ecological and socio-economic features of the many existing GBIs within a place-based and socio-ecological research framework. The project consists of three main approaches which converge in a transdisciplinary analysis of GBI performance: ecological science, political economic analysis and stakeholder co-creation.

Actions

For the case study analyses the following steps will be implemented:

  1. Initial stakeholder analysis of several phases: interviews to identify the main stakeholders for the two parks (with the highest interest and influence); identification of the most important ES for the stakeholders (users, managers, etc.).
  2. Selection of the indicators to measure the capacity (“an ecosystem’s potential to deliver services based on biophysical and social properties and functions” (Villamagna et al., 2013)) of the parks for the selected ES and its actual use (or the flow, which is “actual production or use of the service” (Villamagna et al. (2013)).
  3. Creation of the questionnaire to identify the demand (here, expression of demand through reliance and preference (Wolf et al., 2017)) for the selected ES. Validation of the information during the workshop with the key stakeholders. Later, data collection using the questionnaire.
  4. Analysis of the identified capacity of the parks and comparison with the results of the apparent demand for those services from the stakeholders. Conflicts and synergies will be identified. 
  5. Governance analysis of current regulation will be developed and according to the empirical research results recommendations prepared.

Potential impacts/benefitis

NBS benefits
  • Increase awareness of NBS solution & their effectiveness and co benefits
  • Increase stakeholder awareness & knowledge about NBS
  • Increase willingness to invest in NBS
  • Social learning about location & importance of NBS
Transferability of the Results

The use of the KPI framework is aimed at transferability of results at a case study level while the data behind the indicators of each case study might differ. The KPI aims to identify the performance and challenges of U-GBI on generic themes such as nature, nature’s benefit to people and good quality of life (IPBES framework).

UrbanGaia is a European-wide BiodivERsA project with case studies in different European cities:

Lessons learned

The project is still on-going.

Publications & Reports

In process. Current references:

Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery Ecol Complex 15:114-121 doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004

Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Kastner T, Verburg PH (2017) Quantifying Spatial Variation in Ecosystem Services Demand: A Global Mapping Approach Ecological Economics 136:14-29 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.005

Financing

This research was funded through the 2015-2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals, with the national funders FCT (Portugal), PT-DLR (Germany), RCL (Lithuania), BelSPO (Belgium) and MINECO (Spain).

Organisations
Contacts

BiodivERsA Science-policy/society interfacing: Frederic Lemaître, Frederic.lemaitre@fondationbiodiversite.fr

URBANGAIA Project Coordinator: Prof. Antonio Dinis Fereira, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra (IPC), aferreira@esac.pt

Information on this page is hosted by Oppla