Brague DEMO: Flash flood and wildfire hazards in a Mediterranean catchment

Rivers and lakes, Sparsely vegetated land, Urban, Wetlands, Woodland and forest
Developing climate change adaptation, Improving risk management and resilience
Nbs actions:
Multi-functional nature-based watershed management and ecosystem restoration, Nature-based solutions and the insurance value of ecosystems
Topics (Keywords):
Benefits, Ecosystem dis-services, Ecosystem services, Fire, Effectivness, Indicators/criteria, Land use change, Re-wilding, Green space management, enhancing/conserving urban biodiversity
Start/End date
30 November 2016 to 30 November 2019

European Commission

Design Team




Area Characterisation

The Brague catchment region is located along the Mediterranean coast. A quite dense urban belt is located aside the shore, where all hilly catchments finish their way to the sea.

On 3rd, Oct. 2015, severe rainfalls triggered dramatic floods. Twenty peoples died, 550-650M€ of losses were observed, as well as cascading complications on transportation, communication and energy networks. This event will be used as a calibration case to study torrential flood hazards and risks and the effects of ecosystems on it.

NAIAD will concentrate the investigation effort on the Brague (61 km², 4 dead peoples in 2015, rural headwaters, forested central part and urban lowlands, numerous data on the event features, key impact of large wood jams).


The public perception of ecosystems (e.g. forests, including possibly protecting ones) is strongly worsened following floods with massive wood jams. This case study aims at performing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of a Mediterranean catchment to assess NBS benefits, dis-benefits and co-benefits and ways to optimize them.


The NAIAD project will help to better understand what occurred in details and in which extend Nature-Based Solutions may help to improve the situation. Among others, the three NAIAD partners mainly involved in the DEMO study will in particular:

  • Study risk and ecosystem perception through interviews and workshops,
  • Assimilate current initiatives and projects to optimize their NBS aspects,
  • Analyze the hydrological, hydraulics and related damages of management scenarios and highlight NBS pro and cons,
  • Analyze the cascading effects of wildfire and urban sprawling on hydrology,
  • Assess the flood risk on the case study accounting for climate change and cascading hazards,
  • Provide updated methods to valuate damages in flash floods contexts,
  • Provide methods to evaluate the co-benefit of NBS.

Potential impacts/benefitis

A better knowledge of ecosystem mere, dis- and co- benefits should enable more comprehensive and integrated forest management in the both the riparian and hillslope areas. This will enhance:

  • Increase stakeholder awareness & knowledge about NBS.
  • Increase willingness to invest in NBS.
  • Increase awareness of NBS solution & their effectiveness and co benefits.

The better understanding of the catchment will also enable to tailor the protection system maximizing both green and grey solution effectiveness and efficiency for the aims of :

  • Increase quality and quantity of green and blue infrastructures.
  • Improve connectivity and functionality of green and blue infrastructures.
  • Increase Biodiversity.
  • Flood peak reduction.
  • Reduce flood risk.

NBS benefits
  • Developing climate change adaptation; improving risk management and resilience
  • Flood peak reduction
  • Reduce flood risk
  • Restoring ecosystems and their functions
  • Improve connectivity and functionality of green and blue infrastructures
  • Increase Biodiversity
  • Increase quality and quantity of green and blue infrastructures
  • Enhancing sustainable urbanisation
  • Increase awareness of NBS solution & their effectiveness and co benefits
  • Increase stakeholder awareness & knowledge about NBS
  • Increase willingness to invest in NBS
Transferability of the Results

The Brague catchment analysis can likely be transferred at various scales depending on the topics:



Effects of large wood on flood hazard aggravation


Links between wildfire, urban sprawling and hydrology   Mediterranean

Damage curves for flash flood damage valuation


NBS co-benefit analysis

French coast

Lessons learned

The case study is particularly rich in data on flash floods and related issues. The in-depth analysis will enhance our understanding of large wood-related flood aggravation. More lessons will emerge within the live time of the case study.

Publications & Reports

This case study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 730497 for the project “NAture Insurance value: Assessment and Demonstration” (NAIAD) within call SC5-09-2016 Operationalising insurance value of ecosystems.


IRSTEA (Torrential Flood processes) Contact: / Coord.


Review on forest influences on hydrology, woody debris and sediment supply Hazard maps method definition (numerical modeling and expert assessment) Methods to assess and propagate information imperfection (imprecision, uncertainties)

Assessment of the existing insurance systems in all Europe


Review of relevant ecosystem service valuation techniques

Monetary assessment of damage mitigation due to ecosystems (cost-benefit analysis)

Assessment of needed socio-economic and institutional change supporting NBS Co-construction of insurance schemes supporting NBS


Modelling of damages (residential, industrial) Nat Cat data analysis

Damage mapping

Alternative insurance business model research


Jean-Marc TACNET  (ThinkNature id :      jean-marc.tacnet)

Information on this page is hosted by Oppla